Theological conversation across the street
Reading my blog roll tonight, found this. Enjoy.
Reading my blog roll tonight, found this. Enjoy.
One thing to add to my previous post with regards to Jeremy Archer. I think that Archer is doing the right thing — he is not convinced that his previous baptism is invalid, and to say that it is in order to appease some would be lying and going against conscience. Jeremy, I applaud you, and will be praying for you.
Note: long rambling post ahead
A topic that has crossed a segment of the blog world in which I run recently is the issue of baptism and church membership. Specifically, credobaptist (believer’s baptism) churches barring pedobaptists (infant baptism) from church membership.